Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Goodlow, Jr. v. JLM Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goodlow, Jr.
Defendant:
JLM Transportation, Inc., Watford Insurance Company and Colton Michael Boykin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Goodlow v. JLM Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goodlow, Jr.
Defendant:
JLM Transportation, Inc., Colton Michael Boykin, Watford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Maurice v. Watford Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv04006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice
Defendant:
Watford Insurance Company, Dudley Truitt and McDonald Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Patrick et al v. Blackboard Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv10274
Plaintiff:
Tara Leigh Patrick, Cielo Jean "CJ" Gibson, Denise Trlica a/k/a Denise Milani and others
Defendant:
BLACKBOARD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY f/k/a HAMILTON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, United Specialty Insurance Company, Watford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Watford Insurance Company v. The Michels Law Firm et al
as 4:2022cv01323
Plaintiff:
Watford Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Michels Law Firm and Joe Michels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Pianovich v. Watford Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2021cv01439
Not Classified By Court:
Daniel Pianovich, Insurance Company watford, Trucking McDonald and others
Defendant:
Watford Insurance Company, McDonald Trucking, Inc., Frederick Hughes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watford Insurance Company v. Sink et al
as 2:2021cv03233
Plaintiff:
Watford Insurance Company
Defendant:
Esquire Robert Sink, ESTATE OF ROBERT T. GIBSON and Robert Sink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
