Cases 31 - 40 of 3,885
Hancock County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45572
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City Of Lima v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45333
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Lima
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Butler County Board of Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45037
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Butler County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Tacoma v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2017op45047
Plaintiff:
City of Tacoma
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whitman County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46009
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Whitman County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kitsap County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45956
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kitsap County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pierce County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45195
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
