Cases 1 - 10 of 405
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Saxton
as 24-40223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Rhodes
Defendant:
Garrett Saxton, Practice Manager, Rachel Burleson, Facility Nurse Manager, Tonia G. McNaughton, Nurse Practitioner and others
Gutierrez v. Watson
as 5:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Gutierrez
Defendant:
Richard Delmar Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucear v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Demontra Sharod Lucear
Defendant:
Brian Watson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Watson
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Bell, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Watson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Cook et al
as 4:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Mack Watson, Jr
Defendant:
Randall S. Cook and Angela Chervalier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Dr. Julye et al
as 9:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
M.C. Metcalf
Defendant:
Dr. Julye, Dr. Montgomery, Unknown Female Officer Rover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
