Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Douglas Chertok v. SRS Acquiom, Inc, et al
as 23-12787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CHERTOK
Defendant / Appellee:
SRS ACQUIOM, INC, a Delaware corporation, WEWORK COMPANIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, SRS ACQUIOM HOLDINGS LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Alexander v. WeWork Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
Liam Preston Alexander
Defendant:
WeWork Inc. and Alex Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CHERTOK v. SRS ACQUIOM, INC. et al
as 0:2023cv60821
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CHERTOK
Defendant:
SRS ACQUIOM, INC., WEWORK COMPANIES, LLC, SRS ACQUIOM HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
NY Black and Gold Corporation v. WeWork Management LLC
as 1:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
NY Black and Gold Corp. and NY Black and Gold Corporation,
Defendant:
WeWork Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Chaplin v. WeWork Management LLC
as 1:2021cv07746
Plaintiff:
Renee Chaplin
Defendant:
WeWork Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
Chaplin v, We Work Management, LLC
as 1:2021cv07748
Plaintiff:
Renee Chaplin
Defendant:
WeWork Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
Finnegan v. Wework Inc.
as 1:2021cv05593
Defendant:
Wework Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Matthew Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fitzgerald v. The We Company et al
as 1:2020cv05260
Defendant:
David Stiles, The We Company doing business as WeWork and Danny Duong
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Nolan v. WeWork Companies Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00470
Defendant:
WeWork Management, LLC and WeWork Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
