Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products, Michigan Seamless Tube, LLC, Webco Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Dalmine S.p.A.
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products, Michigan Seamless Tube, LLC, PTC Alliance Corp. and others
Defendant:
United States
Goodluck India Limited v. United States
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Goodluck India Limited
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor Defendant:
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products, Michigan Seamless Tube, LLC, PTC Alliance Corp. and others
Lockett v. Webco Industries
as 21-5041
Defendant / Appellee:
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC., previously named as Webco, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRICK LOCKETT
Webco Industries, Inc. v. Weatherford International, LLC
as 4:2020cv00457
Plaintiff:
Webco Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Weatherford International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodluck India Limited v. US
as 20-2017
Defendant / Appellant:
PTC ALLIANCE CORP., WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC., ARCELORMITTAL TUBULAR PRODUCTS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOODLUCK INDIA LIMITED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Peters v. Webco Industries, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00451
Plaintiff:
Isaiah J Peters
Defendant:
Webco Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Webco Industries, Inc. v. Tejas Tubular Products, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00704
Plaintiff:
Webco Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Tejas Tubular Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
