Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Weber v. RWL Architects, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv02281
Plaintiff:
Frank Weber
Defendant:
RWL Architects, Inc. and Ronald M. Landig
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Weber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Justin Weber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Weber v. Baker et al
as 3:2012cv01717
Plaintiff:
Janet Weber
Defendant:
Adam Baker, Gangloff Industries, Inc., Thangarajah Kanagasabai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malcolm v. Davidson et al
as 1:2012cv00562
Plaintiff:
James Malcolm
Defendant:
Daniel Davidson , Robert Miles, Todd Staimpel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Invacare Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012cv00259
Defendant:
Dan T. Moore, III, C. Martin Harris, Dale C. LaPorte and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dawn Powell
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio, Zach Scott, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weber et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22493
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Weber and Johnson & Johnson
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System v. Blouch et al
as 1:2011cv01893
Defendant:
Gerald B. Blouch , Aaron Malachi Mixon, III , Joseph B. Richey, II and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 301
Sudberry v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
James D. Sudberry, r
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, C/O Pottenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weber v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20596
Plaintiff:
Larry Weber
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
