Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jocelyn Manship, et al v. Jason Stein, et al
as 24-1383
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN MANSHIP and JULIE WEISMAN
Defendant:
JASON STEIN, HERBERT STEIN and HARRIS STEIN
MANSHIP et al v. STEIN et al
as 2:2021cv10389
Defendant:
JASON STEIN, HARRIS STEIN and HERBERT STEIN
Plaintiff:
JULIE WEISMAN and JOCELYN MANSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEISMAN v. BAUR et al
as 5:2020cv06100
Defendant:
PAUL BAUR, MRS. ELENY ZEPPOS, MR. GEORGE ZEPPOS and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD WEISMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLUESE, BECKER & SALTZMAN, LLC et al v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
as 3:2020cv06336
Plaintiff:
PLUESE, BECKER & SALTZMAN, LLC, FRENKEL LAMBERT WEISS WEISMAN & GORDON, LLP, POWERS KIRN LLC and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv14855
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ELLIOT v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06427
Plaintiff:
ELAINE ELLIOT
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and FRENKEL, LAMBERT, WEISS, WEISMAN & GORDON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WOOD v. ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2013cv05673
Plaintiff:
KEITH WOOD
Defendant:
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , DAVID C. WEISMAN, ABINGTON NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOOD v. ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2013cv02644
Plaintiff:
KEITH WOOD
Defendant:
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , DAVID C. WEISMAN and ABINGTON NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
