Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WELCH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2020cv00446
Plaintiff:
ANNA MARIE WELCH
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. WELCH
as 2:2020cv00140
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Interested Party:
21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
RICHARD A WELCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELCH v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
JOCELYNE WELCH
Defendant:
CITY OF BIDDEFORD , ROGER P BEAUPRE , EDWARD DEXTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WELCH
as 2:2017mc00307
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JOHN WELCH
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
GROSS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M GROSS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, GLEAN BROWN, SUSAN CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHOFF v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 2:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R SCHOFF, JR
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JODY BRETON, SCOTT LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAVALHO v. BURNHEIMER et al
as 2:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CRAVALHO
Defendant:
SCOTT BURNHEIMER , JEFFREY MERRILL , SHAWN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOMBS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S COOMBS
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, SHAWN C WELCH and LUKE MONAHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELCH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
TAMMY S WELCH
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
