Cases 31 - 40 of 189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 6:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Installation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karva et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv04557
Plaintiff:
Diquita Romance Karva, Quita Romer, Diquita Romer and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A., MERS CORP Holdings, Inc, Vape Karva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 8:2021cv02576
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Instillation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fulton County, Georgia et al v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al
as 1:2021cv01800
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Financial Georgia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cobb County, Georgia, DeKalb County, Georgia and Fulton County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Atraqchi et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2021cv00956
Defendant:
Marie Hanson, Jackie Lemke, Mike Hanson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Atraqchi and Irene S. Atraqchi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
