Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02477
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Charles Chapman v. Steven Lawson, et al
as 15-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN LAWSON, Cincinnati Police Officer, AGENTS OF REGIONAL NARCOTICS UNIT AND ORGANIZED CRIME DIVISON, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Lawson et al
as 1:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Steven Lawson, Agents of Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Divison, Mark Tiereny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancey v. West Customer Management Group, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01299
Plaintiff:
Joi Yancey
Defendant:
West Customer Management Group, LLC and West Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Rotuna v. West Corporation
as 4:2009cv01608
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rotuna
Defendant:
West Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. Isiogu et al
as 2:2009cv12577
Plaintiff:
Michigan Bell Telephone Company
Defendant:
Orjiakor N Isiogu, Monica Martinez, Steven A Transeth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Type:
Contract
McTier et al v. Restaurant Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00477
Plaintiff:
Ozella McTier, Ozella McTier, Adel McTier and others
Defendant:
Restaurant Management, Inc. and RMB West Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01657
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Nextel West Corporation v. Scio, Township of et al
as 5:2007cv11159
Plaintiff:
Nextel West Corporation
Defendant:
Scio, Township of and Scio Township Zoning Board of Appeals
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
