Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GORDON et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv04861
Defendant:
PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, GURBIR SINGH GREWAL, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE GORDON, SR., THE ESTATE OF MAURICE GORDON JR and RACQUEL BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WETZEL v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2020cv16130
Defendant:
CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HETERO USA, INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WINFIELD WETZEL
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes v. Nwachukwi et al
as 3:2019cv14464
Defendant:
Lea Martin, JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRAIG HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRATIS v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv09674
Plaintiff:
TAMI FRATIS
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
FRANCHI v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv09006
Plaintiff:
ADAM FRANCHI
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JANE D. CARLIN, ROBERT B. CROWL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SHAEV v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv08847
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAEV
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SMITH v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv08396
Plaintiff:
GREG SMITH
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LEI v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv07934
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEI
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JANE D. CARLIN, ROBERT B. CROWL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, THE V. ADAM WETZEL & SON, INC.
as 2:2008cv03272
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
Defendant:
ADAM WETZEL & SON, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
