Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Whitehead v. The Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Bobby Whitehead
Defendant:
The Mississippi Department of Public Safety, R. T. Vaughn and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitehead v. Urology P.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kris Whitehead
Defendant:
Urology P.A., Urologic Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC, Dr. C. Stephen Farmer, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Gates et al v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates, Robert Hornsby, Cory Mooney and others
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Whitehead v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
David Lidell Whitehead
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Morrow v. Arnold et al
as 3:2019cv00832
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility, Nurse Practitioner Hollinghead, Dr. Arnold and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Page
as 3:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Nolen Whitehead
Defendant:
Gregory Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pride-Rogers v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Pride-Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America and Paulette Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00227
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
