Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith et al v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12035
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith and Annie Whitener
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Whitener v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01830
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Claude Whitener
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta Corporation and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Whitener v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
NNEKA C. WHITENER
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Martha Medina-Malthes
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitener v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
Michael Devel Whitener and Michael D Whitener
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102
WHITENER v. WARDEN
as 1:2020cv00686
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
DAQUAN WHITENER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitener v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00023
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Daquan Whitener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitener v. Warden
as 3:2019cv01193
Petitioner:
Michael Devel Whitener and Michael Whitener
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
