Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff: JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant: DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Hicks v. Whitten
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff: Charles P Hicks
Defendant: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant: Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff: Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Whitten, et al
as 23-2161
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK PRICE
Defendant / Appellant: FRANCIS WHITTEN and THADDEUS ALLEN
Defendant: THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO, d/b/a The City of Las Cruces Police Department
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU ROGERS, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Ezell v. Cole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: James Ezell, III
Defendant: David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xiong v. Whitten
as 23-5038
Petitioner / Appellant: FUE XIONG
Respondent / Appellee: RICK WHITTEN
Brown v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner: Brandon Lee Brown
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner: Byron Robinson
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laffoon v. Whitten
as 23-7021
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIAM A. LAFFOON
Respondent / Appellee: RICK WHITTEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?