Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Riggins v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Riggins
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Teresa Norman, Mr. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brantley v. Cooks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
Lerome Brantley
Defendant:
Mary Cooks, Warden Thomas, Captain King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
Wayne Whitten
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Autauga County Commissioners et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
Autauga County Commissioners, James Johnson, Larry Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Sanders et al
as 5:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ray Whitten
Defendant:
Bobby Sanders, Ricky Whitten and Jo Ann Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Dunson et al
as 2:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Owen Lamar Cooper, Sr
Defendant:
Ronald Floyd Dunson, Truman Lamar Dunson, Teresa Lynn Dunson Griffin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owuor v. The Elmore County Commission et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
Peter Makusi Otemba Owuor
Defendant:
The Elmore County Commission, Bill Franklin, Sgt. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Araiza v. Franklin et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00196
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Araiza
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Sgt. Fox and Sgt. Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Whitten et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jarod Harris
Defendant:
Sgt. Whitten, Sgt. Evans, C.O. Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitten v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whitten
Defendant:
Freddie Butler and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
