Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Wilkerson v. Phelps-Powers et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wilkerson, Sr
Defendant:
Melanie Phelps-Powers, Lisa Bruder, Lucas Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilder v. The Kroger Co
as 1:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wilder
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03995
Plaintiff:
Nakisha Wilder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Yammine et al
as 1:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilder
Defendant:
Ralph Yammine, U.C. Tower, LLC, Daniel Wacks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03063
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teresa Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2021cv00715
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Wilder
3Rd Party Defendant:
Transform Innovel Solutions, LLC, John Doe Corporations and Innovel Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv05440
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wilder Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Gojo Industries, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00562
Plaintiff:
Miller, Jasmine Wilder, Matthew Downing and others
Defendant:
Gojo Industries, Inc. d/b/a Purell and Gojo Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Evenflo Company, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilder
Defendant:
Evenflo Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
