Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hawkins v. The Simon Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hawkins
Defendant:
The Simon Law Firm, P.C. and Amy Collignon Gunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gunn v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 2:2022cv02162
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Gunn
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quezergue v. Gunn et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kenzo Quezergue
Defendant:
Bret T. Gunn, Judge Cheryl Blackburn, Victor S. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guptill v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Miles Guptill
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga and Joel Gunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Avery v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2020cv00018
Defendant:
Clinton J. Morgan, Melissa Roberge, Rob Mcguire and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Alexander Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. BRP, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00997
Plaintiff:
Gary N. Gunn
Defendant:
BRP US Inc. and BRP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Hope Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02528
Garnishee:
Hope Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Brandon Gunn
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gunn v. Thorton et al
as 3:2018cv00474
Plaintiff:
Brian David Gunn
Defendant:
L.T. Simonelli, Timothy E Thorton and Lt. Knox County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
