Cases 1 - 10 of 16,367
Johnson v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv05232
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Johnson
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Mendez Heras (#654794) and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Andes
as 5:2024cv03722
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell v. Lucian Grainge et al
as 8:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell
Defendant:
Sir Lucian Grainge, Shawn Carter, Robyn Fenty and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Araujo v. Johnson
as 1:2024at00484
Petitioner:
David Angel Araujo
Respondent:
Acting Director Jason Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Araujo v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01735
Petitioner:
David Angel Araujo
Respondent:
Jason Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Northland THEA LLC v. Raheem Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv05137
Plaintiff:
Northland Thea LLC
Defendant:
Raheem Johnson and Does 1 to 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Lopez v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Company et al
as 3:2024cv03573
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lopez
Defendant:
Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
