Cases 1 - 10 of 708
PEUGH et al v. NADLER et al
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTA PEUGH and BCC CONCESSIONS, LLC
Defendant:
ADAM J. NADLER and TWISTED TATERS FOOD TRUCK AND MORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Adam Ross
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Darnell D Jackson
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Jason Smiley, Adam Leidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Adam Henry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reef v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Reef
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson et al v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Rodney G. Robertson and Angietoria C. Reese
Defendant:
William A. Adams and 47 Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
VAIL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
SARA VAIL
Defendant:
MARCUS ADAMS and MAG CARRIERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
