Cases 1 - 10 of 43
PEEPLES v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2018cv09775
Plaintiff:
SHAREESE M PEEPLES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, A VISO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv09410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03810
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JOHNSON v. DUNCAN et al
as 2:2017cv02624
Plaintiff:
VANDYKE JOHNSON
Defendant:
ROSE DUNCAN, JOSEPH CHARLES, JR., BENJAMIN BERNOUY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SOUMILAS et al
as 1:2017cv02433
Plaintiff:
DAMON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NEVAN SOUMILAS, RECORD SUPPORT TECHNICIAN, SHERYL KLEMOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINNEMEN v. URICOECHEA et al
as 1:2017cv01680
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
FRED URICOECHEA, CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ADAM JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRARA v. UNION COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv09250
Plaintiff:
STEVEN FERRARA
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT , UNION COUNTY CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT , UNION COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2016cv09072
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSER
Defendant:
B. WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-6, MORRIS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY RESPONSE TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENRY v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2016cv08566
Plaintiff:
BASIM HENRY
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv07961
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARD
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
