Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Washington v. Charles County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv02563
Defendant:
Charles County Sheriff's Dept., Judge Talley, John & Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Darrin Winston Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Innocent v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 8:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
Gerald Innocent
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Mc Cabe Weisberg & Conway, Erin Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Cecil County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv02349
Plaintiff:
Shawn A. Bell
Defendant:
Cecil County Sheriff Dept. and Janney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Law v. Cecil County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Darrell Law
Defendant:
Cecil County Sheriffs Dept., Kennedy, . and Rudy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Williams v. Caroline County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv03115
Plaintiff:
Derrell Williams
Defendant:
Caroline County Sheriff Dept. and James Henning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagler v. George et al
as 8:2009cv02560
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Hagler
Defendant:
George, Prince George County Police Dept and Pince George County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Routzahn et al
as 8:2008cv03479
Plaintiff:
Rodney William Wolfe
Defendant:
Thomas Routzahn, J. R. Footen and Washington County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tani v. St. Mary's County et al
as 8:2008cv01950
Plaintiff:
Kess Tani
Defendant:
St. Mary's County, Francis J. Russell, Kenneth R. Dement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
