Cases 1 - 10 of 2,096
Davis v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02642
Petitioner:
Patrick James Davis
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Levon Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis-Perry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
Janissa Davis-Perry
Defendant:
United States of America
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. GP Packaging and Cellulose, LLC
as 1:2024cv02544
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Davis
Defendant:
GP Packaging and Cellulose, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Christopher Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02496
Plaintiff:
Onika Davis
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Fulton County, Georgia, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Davis v. TRC Staffing Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Latoya Davis
Defendant:
TRC Staffing Services, Inc. doing business as TRC Talent Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Defendant:
Kimberly Kelly and Renald Grondin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
