Cases 1 - 10 of 301
Coffman v. Vinita Forensic Center Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv02308
Defendant:
Sandra Tryson, Jason Morgan, Jonathan Brodrick and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin David Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Ryan v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03154
Defendant:
Seth Osborn, Progress Review Panel, Kansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Ryan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Davis (ID 83253) v. Howes et al
as 5:2024cv03143
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Defendant:
Jesse Howes, Jeanie Burk, James Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Scott
Interested Party:
Seward County Sheriff
Defendant:
Angie Davis and Gene Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03097
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Petitioner:
Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
