Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Dale E. Phillips v. The Irvine Company LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00622
Defendant:
Fashion Island Guard, Newport Beach Police Department, The Irvine Company LLC doing business as Fashion Island and others
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teresa Watson, et al v. John E. Phillips
as 21-16050
Appellee:
JOHN E. PHILLIPS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESA WATSON
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
(PC) Phillips v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gann v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2019cv01797
Plaintiff:
Oscar Zelaya, Michael Warzek, Thomas Michael Joseph Fox and others
Defendant:
T. Thornton, Valley State Prison, Timothy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Phillips v. South Coast Plaza, et al
as 18-56070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH COAST PLAZA, ROLEX WATCH USA, INC. and DOES, 1-25
Dale E. Phillips V. South Coast Plaza et al
as 8:2018cv00812
Defendant:
Rolex Watch USA, Inc., South Coast Plaza and Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Phillips and Dale E Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dale E. Phillips V. South Coast Plaza et al
as 2:2018cv03843
Defendant:
Does, Rolex Watch USA, Inc. and South Coast Plaza
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Phillips
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Arnold et al
as 3:2017cv02089
Plaintiff:
Leah Y. Arnold
Defendant:
Robert L. Arnold, Mary Mitchell, Melinda R. Meeken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip v. California, State of
as 3:2017cv01356
Petitioner:
James E. Phillip
Respondent:
California, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
