Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Gilland et al v. City of Baldwyn, Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Chris Gilland , Paul W. Ferrell , Anthony Buse and others
Defendant:
City of Baldwyn, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ferrell v. FTS International Services LLC
as 4:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Robert Ferrell
Defendant:
FTS International Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ferrel v. Southern Tire Mart, LLC
as 4:2018cv00688
Plaintiff:
Michael Ferrel
Defendant:
Southern Tire Mart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ferrell v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01270
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ferrell
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Christopher Ferrell
as 17-41280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WADE FERRELL
Ferrell v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15267
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ferrell
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrell v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv12437
Plaintiff:
Janet Ferrell
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Ferrell et al
as 2:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Larry Earl Young
Defendant:
Ronald Ferrell and Rudy A. Martisek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Lampkin, et al v. UBS Painewebber, Inc., et al
as 17-20608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LAMPKIN, STEPHEN MILLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, formerly known as UBS Painewebber, Incorporated and UBS SECURITIES, L.L.C., formerly known as UBS Warburg, L.L.C.
Ferrell v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07862
Plaintiff:
Rose Ferrell
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
