Cases 1 - 10 of 758
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lovlie v. United States et al
as 0:2024cv01502
Plaintiff:
Jan H. Lovlie
Defendant:
United States, United States of America, United States Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Joseph H. Harper and Wanda Harper
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lohmeier v. Eishen
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Petitioner:
John H. Lohmeier
Respondent:
B. Eishen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shulfer v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
John H. Schulfer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Beck v. Barr et al
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beyer v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv03770
Plaintiff:
Brandon Beyer
Defendant:
Jared Rardin, H. Hanson, Nancy Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viergutz v. Granite Peak Corporation UnitedHealthcare Choice Plus et al
as 0:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Matthew H. Viergutz
Defendant:
United Healthcare, Granite Peak Corporation UnitedHealthcare Choice Plus and UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Henry et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03361
Plaintiff:
Nancy H. Henry and Greggory Anthony Henry
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
