Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Dolores Lloyd v. Presby's Inspired Life, et al
as 19-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOLORES LLOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESBY INSPIRED LIFE, ET AL. and FATIMAH BEY, Senior Property Manager for Interfaith House
Kent v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Lewis Kramer, Vincent Pagano, Jr. and others
Sapphire Bay Condominium West v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds of London et.al.
as 3:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds of London, Thompson Heath and Bond, Ltd., Colin Probyn and others
Plaintiff:
Sapphire Bay Condominium West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Corman et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2018cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jacob Corman , Michael Folmer , Lou Barletta and others
Defendant:
Robert Torres and Jonathan M. Marks
Amicu:
Brian McCann , National Democratic Redistricting Committee , League of Women Voters of Pennyslvania and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Carmen Febo San Miguel , James Solomon , John Greiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thum v. Rozanski et al
as 1:2017cv01638
Plaintiff:
Celine Thum
Defendant:
Horacio D. Rozanski, Lloyd W. Howell, Jr., Kevin L. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Keena Stanton
as 16-4395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
KEENA J. STANTON, a/k/a Lloyd Jackson, a/k/a Travis Jackson, a/k/a Keenan Stanton
USA v. Keena Stanton
as 16-4229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEENA J. STANTON, a/k/a Lloyd Jackson, a/k/a Travis Jackson, a/k/a Keenan Stanton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
