Cases 31 - 40 of 134
LLOYD v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAY et al
as 1:2016cv03717
Plaintiff:
JOHN LLOYD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR, NURSES JANE DOES #'S 1 THROUGH 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03081
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LLOYD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
SMITH v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
HARRY G. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
LLOYD GENE ROGERS, JR., MARK YINGLING, RAY BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Lloyd Washington, Jr.
as 15-3278
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LLOYD WASHINGTON, JR.
LINDSEY v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2015cv04182
Petitioner:
LLOYD LINDSEY
Respondent:
PATRICK A. NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Lloyd Massey v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 15-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD MASSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and others
Thomas v. Potteiger et al
as 1:2014cv02323
Petitioner:
Vincent Thomas
Respondent:
Michael Potteiger, Randy Feather, James C. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEGELA v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv01335
Petitioner:
BRADLEY A. MEGELA
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, LLOYD A. WHITE and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
