Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 400
Bailey v. Riehl et al
as 3:2024cv00993
Plaintiff: Jaquan Marquise Bailey
Defendant: Joseph Riehl, Kevin Bowerman, Robert Fazzino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff: Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant: Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornish v. Town of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff: ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant: Town of New Britain, Calvin Wentworth, Matthew Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff: Alfonso Carmona
Defendant: Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff: ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant: Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cowit et al v. Ricola USA Inc.
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff: Philip Cowit and Matthew Rhoades
Defendant: Ricola USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Markeveys v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff: Matthew Markeveys
Defendant: Scott Semple, Maldonado, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weiss v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff: Steven Weiss
Defendant: Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. William Higgins and others
Interested Party: Matthew Jones
Jones v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. WILLIAMS HIGGINS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?