Cases 1 - 10 of 40
McDonald (D 113183) v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams and Gregory Dimarzo
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03054
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McDonald v. Seipel et al
as 6:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Julianne McDonald
Defendant:
Michael J. Seipel and M & S Trucks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Hazel M. Peterson, Sara Beth Collins, Brandon Gitchel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Sara Beth Collins, Hazel M. Peterson and Jedediah R. Ewing
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:11-cr-10158-EFM-1)
as 6:2020cv01011
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Derrick D. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hughes-Mitchell v. S & SA Kansas Corporation, Inc.
as 6:2020cv01003
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and S & SA Kansas Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leanna Hughes-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
