Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Mays v. Gholston et al
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Travis Clayton Mays
Defendant:
Everett Lee Gholston, Unknown Gholston and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wilcox v. Peck et al
as 3:2024cv08115
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Wilcox
Defendant:
Clayton Peck and Chad Fieple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez #131401 v. Lesinski et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Lesinski, Unknown McElroy, Travis Fitzgibbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Horton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Travis Horton
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alexander v. Callow et al
as 2:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
Travis Alexander
Defendant:
Todd Callow, Unknown Callow, Barney Trucking Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Barraza v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barraza
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Chris Brady, Unknown Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dillion Aero Incorporated v. Johnston et al
as 2:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Dillion Aero Incorporated
Defendant:
Travis Johnston and Drew Johnston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
