Cases 1 - 10 of 53,910
Rader v. Ox Car Care Inc.
as 4:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Michele Rader
Defendant:
Ox Car Care Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mattingly v. USA
as 4:2024cv00447
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ashton Nikoel Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kinder v. Harpe
as 4:2024cv00448
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Petitioner:
Mikel Kinder, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Thornton, Mark Anthony Washington and Mark Anthony Washington Thornton
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragin, III v. Mayes County Courts
as 6:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Stanley Derrick Ragin, III
Respondent:
Mayes County Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ragin, III v. Mayes County Courts
as 6:2024cv00341
Respondent:
Mayes County Courts
Petitioner:
Stanley Derrick Ragin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ragin, III v Mayes County
as 6:2024cv00342
Petitioner:
Stanley Derrick Ragin, III
Counter-Defendant:
Mayes County Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
NexStar Media Inc et al v. Walters et al
as 5:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Kevin Josefy, Gage Shaw, NexStar Media Inc doing business as KFOR-TV and others
Defendant:
Dan Isett and Ryan Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Cortez Meadows
Defendant:
Kenneth Ford, William L Dennis, Jami Jarnigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heflin et al v. Cartmell et al
as 5:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Greg Gerdes, Renee Heflin, Desiree Selby and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Cartmell and Ellen Buettner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
