Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,674
William Murphy, et al v. State of Delaware Justices of the Peace, et al
as 24-1710
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MURPHY, individually and as guardian ad litem on behalf of A.T. and K.M. and TANISHA MURPHY
Defendant: STATE OF DELAWARE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, THE HONORABLE ALAN DAVIS, in his official capacity only as Chief Magistrate of the Justices of the Peace, CONSTABLE HUGH CRAIG, individually and in his official capacity as a Constable of the Justices of the Peace and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
BankUnited NA v. William Scism, et al
as 24-1671
Plaintiff: BANKUNITED NA
Defendant: WILLIAM SCISM, KAREN SCISM and GC OF VINELAND LLC
Defendant / Appellee: GOLDEN CORRAL CORP and GOLDEN CORRAL FRANCHISING SYSTEMS INC
William Wright, Jr. v. Allen, et al
as 24-1560
Plaintiff: WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant: CMC ALLEN, COUNSELOR EZZOLO and CASE MANAGER GABRIEL
Urve MaggittiIn re: Urve Maggitti
as 24-1660
Petitioner: In re: URVE MAGGITTI
Respondent: BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
USA v. William Manderville
as 24-1641
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM MANDERVILLE
USA v. William Leinhauser
as 24-1659
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM LEINHAUSER, a/k/a TRICIA MOON
William Kaetz v. USA
as 24-1646
Plaintiff: WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Neal v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1628
Plaintiff: WILLIAM NEAL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
USA v. William Kaetz
as 24-1605
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM F. KAETZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?