Cases 11 - 20 of 2,851
Cohns v. Mixon et al
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Rodric D Cohns
Defendant:
Quintin Mixon, Curry Branham, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company v. Vick et al
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
LaRenda Vick, Ashley Striplin, William Vick, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pate v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
William Glen Pate, Jr
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Russ Refrigeration HVAC, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv06024
Plaintiff:
Craig Lester Williams and Kelli Williams
Defendant:
Russ Refrigeration HVAC, Inc., Russ Sauders, Allmerica Financial Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Foster v. Elias et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mattrew Elias, Joseph Mahoney, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
