Cases 11 - 20 of 3,959
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Jr. v. CoreCivic of America et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Marvin Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
CoreCivic of America and Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Ramsey William Harris
Defendant:
Vincent Vantell and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Tavarie Alexander Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norman et al v. R. Edward et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman, Rooks Chazsity and Retic Jessica
Defendant:
R. Edward, J. William and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Marty D. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe (RWC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RWC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Williams v. The Bank of Fayette County
as 2:2024cv02216
Plaintiff:
Terry Williams
Defendant:
The Bank of Fayette County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #057 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe #057
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
