Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
William Shaw v. Ed Hay, et al
as 21-35979
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee: ED HAY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CITY OF SPOKANE and others
Shaw v. Hay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00265
Plaintiff: William C Shaw
Defendant: Ed Hay, Department of Corrections, City of Spokane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Shaw v. Edward Hay, et al
as 11-35375
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD HAY, LINCOLN HATHAWAY, SCOTT MASON and others
William Shaw v. USDC-WAESP
as 11-71176
: In re: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest: EDWARD HAY, LINCOLN HATHAWAY and ROBERT COSSEY
Shaw v. Hay et al
as 2:2011cv00021
Plaintiff: William C Shaw
Defendant: Ed Hay, Lincoln Hathaway, Scott Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw et al v. Long
as 7:2010cv07440
Plaintiff: William C. Shaw and Pamela E. Shaw
Defendant: Michael Jason Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Shaw v. USDCSPO
as 10-70442
: In re: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Respondent: USDC, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest: JEROME TAYLOR
William Shaw v. Lincoln Hathaway, et al
as 10-35029
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM C. SHAW
Defendant - Appellee: LINCOLN HATHAWAY, ED HAY, ROBERT COSSEY and others
Shaw v. Director Washington State Dept of Corrections
as 2:2009cv00174
Petitioner: William C Shaw
Respondent: Director Washington State Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaw v. Hathaway et al
as 2:2009cv00026
Plaintiff: William C Shaw
Defendant: Lincoln Hathaway, Ed Hay, Robert Cossey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?