Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sturgis v. Willis et al
as 2:2014cv14032
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis
Defendant:
Timmothy Willis, Molinar, Sara Pope-Starns and others
Stanton v. Hutchins et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Stanton
Defendant:
Nancy Hutchins, Bambi Somerlott, Laurie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tyrone Davidson v. State of Michigan, et al
as 09-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE D. DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS and others
Frank Nali v. William Whitbeck
as 09-1064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK NALI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. WHITBECK, Michigan Court of Appeals
Michael Raihala v. William Whitbeck, et al
as 08-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAIHALA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. WHITBECK, SANDRA SCHULTZ MENGEL, KIMBERLY HAUSER and others
Michael Raihala v. William Whitbeck, et al
as 08-2344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAIHALA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. WHITBECK, SANDRA SCHULTZ MENGEL, KIMBERLY HAUSER and others
Michael Raihala v. William Whitbeck, et al
as 08-2197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAIHALA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. WHITBECK, SANDRA SCHULTZ MENGEL, KIMBERLY HAUSER and others
Davidson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv13761
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D Davidson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Supreme Court, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carnell McCreary v. Arthur Lombard, et al
as 08-1701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL M. MCCREARY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR J. LOMBARD, Judge, KIRSTEN FRANK KELLY, Judge, THERESA M. HAWKINS, Clerk and others
Jackson v. Kalzmarek et al
as 2:2008cv11630
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson
Defendant:
Robert L Kalzmarek, Saginaw County Circuit Court, Saginaw County Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
