Cases 1 - 10 of 10
EVANS v. CAREY et al
as 2:2022cv03769
Plaintiff:
TASHA L EVANS
Defendant:
SERGEANT WILLIAM CAREY, JR., OFFICER JAY RATTMANN, OFFICER DANIEL MULLARKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE v. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. et al
as 3:2018cv04110
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE
Defendant:
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. , WILLIAM CAREY and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
YOUNG v. CITY OF CHESTER, PA et al
as 2:2017cv03066
Plaintiff:
DEVON YOUNG
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, PA, MARC BARAG and WILLIAM CAREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICE v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2016cv01918
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CAREY RICE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
IRONS et al v. CAREY et al
as 2:2015cv01953
Plaintiff:
KALITA IRONS , TYRONE IRONS and TYLIAH IRONS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CAREY , JAMES NOLAN and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAREY v. NATIONAL EVENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05006
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CAREY
Defendant:
NATIONAL EVENT SERVICES, INC. and PHILADELPHIA EAGLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARRIS v. COREY et al
as 2:2014cv03136
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT , THE CITY OF CHESTER and WILLIAM CAREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNCAN v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
RAHNEISHA DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , WILLIAM CAREY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBER v. SHEPPLEMAN et al
as 2:2010cv03620
Plaintiff:
NOAH BARBER
Defendant:
STEPHEN SHEPPLEMAN, WILLIAM CAREY, JR., WILLIAM HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN et al v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2010cv01458
Plaintiff:
BOBBY G. FREEMAN and JULIE SCOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , WILLIAM CAREY, JR. , DONALD JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
