Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Widmann v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
William Charles Widmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Parker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
William Charles Parker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton, Jr. v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01017
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Ed Walker, f/n/u Baumgardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess et al v. Bowers et al (TV2)
as 3:2014cv00502
Defendant:
Chuck Bowers, Wesley G. Norris, Debbie Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
William Charles Burgess and Grace V. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2014cv02129
Plaintiff:
William Charles Harper
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and James E. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. West Tennessee State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2013cv02115
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary, Jerry Lester, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Lester et al
as 2:2012cv03051
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Lester, Haley, Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. West Tenn State Penn et al
as 2:2012cv02799
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
West Tenn State Penn, T.D.O.C., Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
