Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Bey v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv09103
Plaintiff:
Jawan Akil Bey
Defendant:
City of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, Bernard Kerik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3733
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCARLETT v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2011cv06941
Petitioner:
WINSTON SCARLETT
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES, ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shomo v. City of New York
as 11-2642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose J. Shomo
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, William Fraser, Commissioner of City Department of Corrections, Eric Perry, Director and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Joy Meyers, Shahid Nawaz and Rameen Seegobin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07883
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SLUTSKY et al v. GUADAGNO et al
as 3:2010cv05331
Plaintiff:
LARRY SLUTSKY, WENDY SLUTSKY and CLAYTON SLUTSKY
Defendant:
KIM GUADAGNO, WILLIAM FRASER, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
