Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Starrett v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
as 3:2019cv02579
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Army Special Operations Command, National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Starrett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Starrett, Jr. v. Department of Defense, et al
as 19-10969
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY STARRETT, JR.
Starrett v. Department of Defense et al
as 3:2019cv00988
Plaintiff:
William Henry Starrett, Jr
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia LLC, United States Army Special Operations Command and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Starrett v. US Department of Defense et al
as 3:2018cv02851
Plaintiff:
William Henry Starrett, Jr
Defendant:
US Department of Energy, US Special Operations Command, US Army and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
William Starrett, Jr. v. City of Richardson, Texas
as 18-11088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY STARRETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RICHARDSON, TEXAS
William Starrett, Jr. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 18-10389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY STARRETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ARMY CIVIL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS COMMAND and others
Starrett v. City of Richardson
as 3:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
William Henry Starrett, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starrett v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
William Henry Starrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation , Texas Military Department, US Army Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
