Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Eric Dowdy, et al v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 15-1201
Plaintiff:
ERIC DOWDY, et al.
Interested Party - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, DAVE BURNETT and MICHAEL MARTIN
William Johnson v. Jeffrey Wood
as 15-1016
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Johnson #235820 v. Woods
as 2:2014cv00221
Petitioner:
William Johnson #235820
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Haywood County Jail
as 1:2014cv01271
Plaintiff:
Robert William Johnson
Defendant:
Haywood County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont Heard, et al v. Tom Finco, et al
as 14-2195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAMONT BERNARD HEARD, WILLIAM JOHNSON, JAMERO T. MOSES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM FINCO, Deputy Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, MIKE MARTIN, Special Activity Coordinator of Michigan Department of Corrections and BRAD PURVES, Dietician and Food Service Manager
Heard #252329 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard #252329, William Johnson #235820, Jamero T. Moses #231885 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco , Mike Martin and Brad Purves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Finco et al
as 2:2013cv11342
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard, William Johnson, Jamero Moses and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin and Brad Purves
LaVelle Searcy, et al v. Macomb County Jail, et al
as 11-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVELLE W. SEARCY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WITHERSPOON, WILLIAM JOHNSON, SHANNON SEXTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MACOMB COUNTY JAIL, MARK A. HACKEL, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Coy v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2011cv00596
Plaintiff:
Melvin Scott Coy
Defendant:
Barry, County of and William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Johnson v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 10-2699
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
