Cases 1 - 10 of 22
USA v. William Siefert
as 24-5384
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE SIEFERT, MD
United States of America v. Billow
as 24-218
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE BILLOW and William Lawrence Billows
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
William Lawrence, et al v. Ace American Insurance Company
as 19-14675
Intervenor / Appellee:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, individually and as equitable and contratual subrogee of Benjamin Wintersteen
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Defendant / Appellant:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Parshall v. FCB Financial Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01570
Defendant:
William Lawrence Mack, FCB Financial Holdings, Inc., Azalea Merger Sub Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Bushansky v. FCB Financial Holdings, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv62399
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
William Lawrence Mack, FCB Financial Holdings, Inc., Frederic V. Salerno and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Ruben Paul Gonzales v. Grand Pet Care Center et al
as 8:2017cv01892
Defendant:
William Day, Grand Pet Care Center and William Lawrence Day Trust
Plaintiff:
Ruben Paul Gonzales
LAWRENCE v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAMMOT J. DUPONT, MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lawrence v. Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
William Lawrence
Defendant:
Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc., Lammott J Dupont, Michael A. Coke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: William Lawrence Summers
as 2:2016mc00057
Respondent:
William Lawrence Summers
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
