Cases 1 - 10 of 15
William Lee Sullivan v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv06607
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James Luce et al v. The 3M Company et al.
as 2:2024cv05680
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lynn, Edmund Macgregor, Shawn Lucius and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
William Lee Angelo v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04760
Defendant:
EI Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Arkema Inc, Clariant Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Angelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
William Lee v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02754
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. FBOP Regional Center
as 1:2023cv03893
Plaintiff:
William Lee Jones
Defendant:
FBOP Regional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Grant v. US Department of Defense
as 8:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant
Defendant:
US Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv02118
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
Beaumont USP, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA
as 0:2017cv02508
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. USA
as 0:2016cv02465
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gainey v. Cartledge et al
as 1:2014cv04724
Petitioner:
William Lee Gainey
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
