Civil Rights Cases
Jason Johnson, et al v. Phil Bredesen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6106
Plaintiff: JASON ANDREW JOHNSON and TENNESSEE CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN JAY HOOKER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL BREDESEN, in his official capacity as the Govenor of the State of Tennessee, DALE H. TUTTLE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Tennessee Judicial Selection Commission and its remaining members in their official capacity as members of the Commission, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and others
Jason Johnson, et al v. Phil Bredesen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6013
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON ANDREW JOHNSON
Plaintiff: TENNESSEE CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH and JOHN JAY HOOKER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: PHIL BREDESEN, in his official capacity as the Govenor of the State of Tennessee, DALE H. TUTTLE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Tennessee Judicial Selection Commission and its remaining members in their official capacity as members of the Commission, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2007cv00372
Plaintiff: Jason Andrew Johnson, Tennessee Center for Policy Research and John Jay Hooker
Defendant: Phil Bredesen, Phil Bredesen, Phil Bredesen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2007cv00373
Plaintiff: John Jay Hooker
Defendant: Phil Bredesen, Dale H. Tuttle, Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?