Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01455
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.24 Acre of Land, more or less, in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs of Clyde Lee Moore, Lashawn Towns, Unknown Heirs of Candis M. Patton and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Respondent:
Ora Johnson, Jerlean Hawkins and Beulah Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.02 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.58 ACES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-13-29 et al
as 3:2018cv01819
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.02 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.58 ACES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-13-29, PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.66 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 1.87 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-13-30, WILLIAM MOORE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Moore et al
as 1:2011cv01235
Plaintiff:
Chase Home Finance, LLC
Defendant:
William Moore and Latarsha Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. v. Moore et al
as 2:2007cv00978
Plaintiff:
NovaStar Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
William Moore, Jr., Unknown Spouse, if any, of William Moore, Jr. and John A. Dooley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
