Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01455
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv04633
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams Moore and Timothy William Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Norfolk Southern Railway et al
as 1:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
William Moore
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway and Charles J. Fontaino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. General Motors, LLC.
as 1:2016cv00749
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson , Betty Baker , Caleb Boston and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07537
Plaintiff:
William Moore
Defendant:
City of New York and Undercover Officer 39
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. The City of New York Fire Department et al
as 1:2013cv09225
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramos , Carlos H. Ariza , Bridget Alvarez and others
Defendant:
The City of New York Fire Department , Salvatore J. Cassano , Michael R. Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stanfa v. Staats et al
as 7:2012cv01388
Plaintiff:
Taryn Stanfa
Defendant:
James D. Staats , Matthew J. Braunius , William Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Conway
as 1:2010cv03202
Respondent:
James C. Conway
Petitioner:
William Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
