Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Parker v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
William Parker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Moran
as 17-4121
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis Pristell, AKA D, AKA DP, David Young, AKA Kareem, AKA Reem, William Parker, AKA Shah and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Lamont Moran, AKA L, AKA L-Sparks, AKA Gudda
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv06922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Zaball et al v. Benbow et al
as 1:2013cv03511
Plaintiff:
Jose Zaball, Marvin Sanders, Alfonso Duran and others
Defendant:
Benbow, Phillips, Yousuf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Benbow et al
as 1:2013cv03514
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robinson, Jose Zaball, Marvin Sanders and others
Defendant:
Benbow, Phillips, Yousuf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01924
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
William Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06365
Plaintiff:
Marvin Sanders, Darvell Jones, Alfonso Duran and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, The City Department of Correctional Services, (GRVC) Sercurity Oversea and Personnel Erea Supervisor John Doe or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00816
Defendant:
City of New York and Police Officers John and Jane Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
William Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03127
Defendant:
Police Officer James Argila, City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through10
Plaintiff:
William Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
