Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
BATES et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01441
Plaintiff: WARREN BATES and MARY LYNN BATES
Cross Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BROOKWOOD VENTURES, L.P., BW/IP, INC. and others
Defendant: AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant: ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., FLOWSERVE U.S. INC., GENUINE PARTS COMPANY d/b/a National Automotive Parts Association, a/k/a/ NAPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
BAGLEY et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03531
Cross Defendant: THOMAS BAGLEY, ELIZABETH BAGLEY, BEAZER EAST, INC. and others
Defendant: ABB, INC., BIRD CORPORATION, BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. and others
Cross Claimant: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., COPES VULCAN, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WARRINGTON et al v. 3M COMPANY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03207
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. WARRINGTON, SR. and JOAN M. WARRINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY,, ABB, INC.,, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant: HONEYWELL INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE COMPANY
Cross Claimant: THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HILSTER et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01537
Defendant: CRANE INSTRUMENTATION & SAMPLING, INC., FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES W. HILSTER, JR. and SHIRLEY A. HILSTER
Counter Defendant: GRINNELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAY v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant: POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, ZURN INDUSTRIES, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff: CARL E. GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DATA et al v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00879
Cross Defendant: ZURN INDUSTRIES, NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING CO., CARVER PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant: MW CUSTOM PAPERS, LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., MESTEK, INC. and others
Defendant: POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, MET-PRO CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES, a GE Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: DARLENE DATA, MICHAEL DATA and DARLENE DATA, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL DATA, DECEASED,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MARMONTELLO et al v. AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00462
Defendant: GARDNER DENVER, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MAGID GLOVE AND SAFETY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff: JOAN MARMONTELLO and CHARLES MARMONTELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MCNEECE et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04925
Plaintiff: JOHN T. MCNEECE and ELIZABETH MCNEECE
Defendant: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ALFA LAVAL, INC., BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KORCUBA v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv03332
Plaintiff: PRISCILLA S. KORCUBA
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. and others
Cross_claimant: NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY , OWENS-ILLINOIS and AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Cross_defendant: NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COSTA et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03800
Plaintiff: JOHN A. COSTA and CATHERINE COSTA
Defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. , AURORA COMPANY COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Cross_defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. , AURORA COMPANY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?