Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overman v. Steedley
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner: Scott Richard Overman
Respondent: Warden William Steedley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MAYS v. STEEDLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff: RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant: WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and CHAPLAIN ALEXANDER JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYS v. STEEDLEY
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff: RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant: WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. STEEDLEY
as 1:2022cv00177
Petitioner: Billy Eugene Williams
Respondent: HEAD WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. STEEDLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00084
Plaintiff: LEEALVY MILLER
Defendant: WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and CONNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00243
Plaintiff: Dexter Shaw
Defendant: Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Johnny Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. WARD et al
as 1:2021cv00025
Defendant: SGT TONY WARD, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, HEAD WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and others
Plaintiff: LANTARIO LATRAVIAN CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. COLEMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00093
Respondent: Ms. Isais, JEFFERY COLEMAN, Terry Henderson and others
Petitioner: Craig L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Haynes v. Gramiak et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00016
Plaintiff: Eric Haynes
Defendant: Tom Gramiak, Terence Kilpatrick, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?